The other night at the Toldi Mozi (September 17), I had the privilege to
hear a presentation by Jan Gehl, the Danish architect and leading light behind
the livable-cities movement and the worldwide utility cycling explosion. He was
in town for the recent publication of the Hungarian edition of his book, Cities for People (Hungarian title is Élhető városok which translates as “Livable Cities”.
Parenthetical within parenthetical: Why is it that Hungarian translators take
such liberties with titles??). At the start of his talk, Gehl told the 200 or
so of us in the cinema’s big auditorium that he’d prepared a 1.5 hour
Powerpoint lecture. However, he said he’d forego that because he’d given the
same talk last September to what was probably the same crowd. Even though I’d
missed his last appearance, I was very happy to skip the ppt and enjoy a free-wheeling
Q and A with two Hungarian moderators (editors who’d worked on the Hungarian
edition of the book).
At the outset, Gehl noted that this was his second big book
on the subject of people-friendly urban design. The first was Life Between Buildings, published in
1971 and a touchstone text in contemporary urban planning. The most frequent
question Gehl gets about Cities for
People is, What’s the difference between the new book and the old one? “The
answer,” Gehl said, “is 40 years.” That is, 40 years of not just research but
actual implementation of his ideas in cities the world over, from New York to
London to Shanghai.
"We wanted to go someplace where we could watch people. We didn't think we could do that in Denmark." -- Jan Gehl, on his early research trip to Venice
Cities for People
is now out in 25 languages, which gratifies Gehl. “It’s so wonderful that this
book is available all over the world in all these funny languages.” Gehl paused
for a beat, as the crowd had a self-deprecating chuckle. Then he
interjected: “I’m not talking about Hungarian. I’m
talking about French!” This elicited a bigger, gleeful burst of laughter.
Gehl’s first book, despite its huge influence in many
corners of the world, was not published in French until recently. And Gehl noted with some disparagement
that the new French edition of Cities for
People was published not in Paris but in Quebec. His fans in France have to
import the book from Canada. “The French think of themselves as culturally self-sufficient,”
Gehl said, over the crowd’s continued laughter.
With the book plug done, Gehl retold his famous personal
origin myth: how as a university student, he was indoctrinated in the modernist
school of architecture, which instructed that students should forget about
designing cities and focus instead on buildings. Make things that look grand
from a distance, don’t worry so much about the details. Gehl’s perspective
changed dramatically after he finished school and married a psychologist. Gehl said
his wife told him, “You learn so much about form and aesthetics and you know
this much about people!” Gehl held up his hand, showing a quarter-inch between
thumb and forefinger.
Another important influence in his early professional life was
Jane Jacobs, writer of The Death and Life of Great American Cities (1961).
Gehl described her as the “great
grandmother” of people-friendly city design. “She said if you let
modernists and motorists have their way, the great American city will be dead,”
Gehl said.
It’s not a coincidence that the two most influential people
during Gehl’s formative years as an urban design thinker were women. These
days, Gehl presides over the prestigious firm Gehl Architects, with a stable of
more than 50 consultants, many of them architects, but also including anthropologists and maybe even psychologists (Gehl admitted he wasn't sure if he had psychologist on staff -- but he said he worked with a multi-disciplinary group of people, which he says is important in his line of work). “You should come to
my office in Copenhagen some time,” he joked to his young male interviewers.
“Nothing but young women as far as the eye can see.” Gehl was being playful,
but there’s a professional reason behind the feminine tilt, he said. “The girls
in architecture school are interested in improving society, while the boys are
more interested in building big steel towers.”
Gehl said the best contemporary examples of cities designed
for people are the Medieval centres of many European cities. His favourite is
Venice, where he performed some of his seminal research on human behavior in
cities many years ago during a six-month stay with his wife. “We wanted to go
somewhere where we could watch people,” Gehl said. “We didn’t think we could do
that in Denmark.” Another good laugh line -- even though Danish cities are no longer so devoid of people -- thanks in no small measure to Gehl's influence.
“Venice is a people city, designed for people, and it still
works that way,” Gehl said. “Around every corner, you meet a friend and, of
course, you have to talk a little. There are conversations going on all around
you.”
The favelas of Sao Paulo, Brazil, are also examples of
people places – in contrast to the urban centre of Sao Paolo. “The favelas were
designed for people,” Gehl said.
My next post will cover the rest of Jan Gehl's September 17th talk at the Toldi Mozi.
3 comments:
"His favourite is Venice, where he performed some of his seminal research on human behavior in cities many years ago during a six-month stay with his wife."
Nice work if you can get it!
Yeah, Kristin likes to gloat about the class field trip she took to Venice when she was studying art history at CEU. By contrast, the students in the Enviro Sciences and Politics course have always done their class trip to the Budapest solid waste processing facility out by Budaors.
Great post, Very Informative page, I hope it will be useful for all of us. Thanks for sharing it with us. I agree with you.
custom essay writing services uk
Post a Comment